Managing Resistance: How to Reset Expectations With Challenging Direct Reports
Edited By Brandi Neal, Radical Candor podcast writer and producer, and director of content creation for Radical Candor. This article about how to...
3 min read
Radical Candor Nov 26, 2024 12:09:26 PM
Table of Contents
Edited By Brandi Neal, Radical Candor podcast writer and producer, and director of content creation for Radical Candor. This article about how to tackle management dilemmas like poor promotion practices with Radical Candor has been adapted from a conversation between KIm Scott, Radical Candor author and co-founder, and Dick Costolo, managing partner and co-founder at 01 Advisors and former CEO of Twitter.
Promotions. Feedback. Team morale. These aren’t just management buzzwords—they’re the thorny management dilemmas that can make or break a leader’s reputation.
Few know this better than Kim Scott, author and co-founder of Radical Candor, and Dick Costolo, managing partner at 01 Advisors and former CEO of Twitter.
Together, they unpacked the pitfalls of poor management practices and shared their hard-won insights on how leaders can rise to the occasion.

Need help with feedback? Let's talk!
“Managers hate having hard conversations,” Costolo said. “But why take a role where that’s a big part of the job? Avoidance doesn’t just delay discomfort—it creates long-term misery.”
Take the case of an employee promised a promotion. Their manager assured them they were “sitting on their hands” waiting for budget approval. But then the manager left, and the promotion went to someone else. The new leadership was caught off guard, with no knowledge of the prior promise. Cue confusion, resentment, and a sense of betrayal.
“That first manager set the employee up to fail,” Scott said. “They made a promise they couldn’t keep, then left someone else to clean up the mess.”
“That’s leadership malpractice,” Costolo said. “It’s like, ‘People are saying bad things about you, but not me!’ That’s not feedback; it’s hearsay and demoralizing nonsense.”
Scott agreed. “Feedback should be based on observable behaviors. If you don’t have facts, don’t pretend you do. Leaders need to be candid and clear, even if it’s uncomfortable.”
“Promotions shouldn’t be given off-cycle because someone complained. That creates a system where those who speak up get rewarded, and those quietly excelling are sidelined.”
Instead, both Scott and Costolo advocate for transparent, predictable promotion processes. “At startups, an annual promotion cycle is often enough,” Scott said. “It ensures fairness and avoids the chaos of arbitrary decisions.”
Costolo added, “When promotions lack structure, word spreads. Employees compare notes, and suddenly everyone’s frustrated because they realize their manager is just telling them what they want to hear.”
“Go to your manager and say, ‘Let’s clarify the metrics I’m being evaluated on. I want to crush those metrics and understand what that means for my growth,’” he said.
Scott chimed in with a warning: watch out for leaders who use words to confuse or avoid responsibility.
“When someone’s language feels like a fog meant to push you away, don’t waste your energy trying to decode it,” she said. “Focus instead on what you can control: your performance and clear communication.”
Scott agreed. “Radical Candor is about being both caring and direct. It’s not about sugarcoating or dodging hard truths. It’s about showing respect for your team by being honest, even when it’s tough.”
Management isn’t easy, and dilemmas like these can feel like walking a tightrope. But with a commitment to fairness, transparency, and honest communication, leaders can turn tricky situations into opportunities for growth—for themselves and their teams.
The 'pancake problem' is a metaphor Dick Costolo uses to describe managers who make empty promises to avoid difficult conversations. Just as saying 'nobody wants you to have this pancake more than me' while letting someone else eat it feels like a betrayal, promising an employee a promotion without being honest about the real obstacles sets them up for disappointment, resentment, and a loss of trust in leadership.
Feedback around promotions should always be grounded in observable, specific behaviors — not hearsay or vague impressions. Kim Scott emphasizes that if you don't have concrete facts, you shouldn't pretend you do. Telling someone 'I've heard you're saying negative things, but I haven't seen it myself' isn't feedback — it's demoralizing and dishonest. Leaders must be candid and clear, even when the conversation is uncomfortable.
Giving off-cycle promotions to employees who complain creates a broken incentive system where speaking up loudly gets rewarded over consistent, quiet excellence. Dick Costolo warns that word spreads fast — once employees compare notes and realize promotions are arbitrary, morale and trust collapse. Both Costolo and Kim Scott advocate for structured, predictable promotion cycles (such as an annual review) to ensure fairness and avoid the chaos of ad hoc decisions.
Take control of the conversation. Dick Costolo recommends going directly to your manager and asking to clarify the specific metrics you're being evaluated on, then committing to exceeding those metrics. Kim Scott adds that if a manager's language feels like deliberate fog designed to avoid accountability, stop trying to decode it. Instead, focus your energy on what you can control: your own performance and maintaining clear, direct communication.
According to Kim Scott and Dick Costolo, a manager's job isn't to make people feel good in the moment — it's to build long-term trust and alignment. Radical Candor means being both genuinely caring and directly honest. Sugarcoating or dodging hard truths might reduce short-term discomfort, but it creates long-term misery, resentment, and confusion. Leading with integrity and transparency is how managers turn difficult situations into growth opportunities for their teams.
When a manager promises a promotion they can't deliver and then departs, the employee is left in limbo — and the incoming manager is blindsided. This creates confusion, resentment, and a sense of betrayal that can be very hard to repair. Kim Scott describes this as the first manager 'setting the employee up to fail.' The lesson: never make promises you can't keep, and always be transparent about what is and isn't within your control.
Three ways to put this into practice.
Related reading
Edited By Brandi Neal, Radical Candor podcast writer and producer, and director of content creation for Radical Candor. This article about how to...
Edited By Brandi Neal, Radical Candor podcast writer and producer, and director of content creation for Radical Candor. When leaders prioritize...
Edited By Brandi Neal, Radical Candor podcast writer and producer, and director of content creation for Radical Candor. This article about how...