Podcast Episode 23: Can I Give Feedback to Peers? Should I?
The purpose of feedback is to help people find more success, so it’s bananas to think it’s only the manager’s job to give feedback. It’s everyone’s...
2 min read
Brandi Neal Nov 16, 2020 1:00:19 AM
Table of Contents
How can you get your employees more engaged at work if they're not invested in the company long term, and is it your obligation to be Radically Candid with a peer at work who you know is lying? On this episode of the Radical Candor podcast, Amy and Jason answer listener questions, discuss their stints working in food service (their experiences involve mayonnaise and organized crime) and muse whether or not people can be more like Clay Christensen.
Listen to the episode:
Our first question on this episode of the Radical Candor podcast comes from a listener who manages a restaurant. "I work at a well-established restaurant in San Francisco. I manage a team of about 20 people. Being in the restaurant industry, I feel like there is a lack of commitment to the company for the employees. There are also a few different BIG personalities that sometimes clash. I am struggling with making my team care more and figuring out how to navigate through the challenges of getting a team to communicate and work together in such a high-stress and fast-paced environment."
Our second question season 2, episode 15 of the Radical Candor podcast comes from someone experiencing a moral dilemma. "I am in a situation with a colleague who is severely underperforming and has been for at least a year. He has recently begun to lie about his work to others while in a group setting. Other people believe him, while I know he is blatantly lying. Is this something you would still consider being radically candid about? We are peers who report to the same manager."
The late author, innovator and HBS professor Clay Christensen with Radical Candor's own Amy Sandler
Many of us have convinced ourselves that we are able to break our own personal rules 'just this once.' In our minds, we can justify these small choices. None of those things, when they first happen, feels like a life-changing decision. The marginal costs are almost always low. But each of those decisions can roll up into a much bigger picture, turning you into the kind of person you never wanted to be.
If you give in to 'just this once,' based on a marginal-cost analysis, you'll regret where you end up. That's the lesson I learned: it's easier to hold to your principles 100 percent of the time than it is to hold to them 98% of the time. The boundary—your personal moral line—is powerful because you don't cross it; if you have justified doing it once, there's nothing to stop you doing it again.
Decide what you stand for. And then stand for it all the time." ― Clayton M. Christensen, How Will You Measure Your Life?
The Radical Candor Podcast theme music was composed by Cliff Goldmacher. Order his book: The Reason For The Rhymes: Mastering the Seven Essential Skills of Innovation by Learning to Write Songs.
Start by making sure your team understands the restaurant's goals and what the establishment values. When people have a clear picture of shared goals, they're more likely to invest in meeting them. From there, show each person why their specific role matters and what success looks like in practice. Finally, celebrate wins consistently — recognizing people when they hit goals creates a culture of engagement even in high-turnover environments.
Yes — Radical Candor applies to peers, not just direct reports. Before you approach the conversation, remember that most people lie to cover up a mistake, not because they enjoy it. Go in with a genuinely helpful mindset, envision a positive outcome for both of you, and be clear about how you want to help. Critically, don't have the conversation while you're feeling emotional — approach it from curiosity, not blame.
Managing your emotions before the conversation is essential. If you go in feeling angry or accusatory, you're likely to trigger defensiveness rather than openness. Wait until you can approach the conversation from a place of genuine curiosity — ask questions rather than make accusations. This gives your peer the best chance to be honest and gives the conversation the best chance of producing a good outcome for everyone involved.
Christensen argued that it's easier to hold to your principles 100% of the time than 98% of the time — because once you justify crossing your moral line "just this once," there's nothing stopping you from doing it again. Applied to peer feedback, this means you shouldn't talk yourself out of a difficult but honest conversation. Staying silent when you know something is wrong is a small compromise that can quietly erode the kind of person you want to be at work.
The Radical Candor approach starts with alignment: make sure everyone understands the team's shared goals and values before trying to manage personality conflicts. When people are working toward something they all believe in, friction becomes easier to address. From there, communicate clearly about how the team is expected to work together, and use recognition to reinforce the behaviors you want to see. Clear expectations plus consistent celebration of success can go a long way in fast-paced settings like restaurants.
Three ways to put this into practice.
Related reading
The purpose of feedback is to help people find more success, so it’s bananas to think it’s only the manager’s job to give feedback. It’s everyone’s...
One of the most common mistakes bosses make is thinking their job is to tell people what to do. But that doesn't work! So how can you get people...
When giving feedback, you should expect emotion. Even when you don’t personalize, it’s personal. That’s why you should eliminate the phrase, “Don’t...